Sunday 28 May 2023

Why a Larger Spotlight is Needed on Co-Lending Deals Between Banks and NBFCs

 

Why a Larger Spotlight is Needed on Co-Lending Deals Between Banks and NBFCs

The relationship that PSU banks establish with NBFCs run by big corporate groups need to be watched very carefully due to potential moral hazard problems.

 

Why a Larger Spotlight is Needed on Co-Lending Deals Between Banks and NBFCs

A man checks his mobile phones in front of State Bank of India (SBI) branch in Kolkata, February 9, 2018. Photo: Reuters/Rupak De Chowdhuri/Files

 

Thomas Franco

BANKING

09/DEC/2021

 

The Reserve Bank of India’s push for co-lending arrangements between banks and non-banking financial companies was brought back into the spotlight this week when State Bank of India announced that it had entered into a tie-up with the Adani Group for the very same.

 

 

Chinese Construction of Waterfalls in the building 350, फीट ऊंची इमारत से बह निकला झरना - Travel Nfx

02:04

 

Previous

PauseNext

 

00:57 / 03:02

Unmute

Settings

Fullscreen

Copy video url

Play / Pause

Mute / Unmute

Report a problem

Language

Share

Vidverto Player

Take a second to consider what the detail entails. SBI — the largest lender in the country with a customer base of 45.92 crores, a branch network of 22,219 branches, and 2,45,652 employees — has entered into a deal with Adani Capital, which has just 63 branches in 6 states with 758 staff.

 

 

This partnership — which the accompanying press release says is being done for increasing lending to the farm sector — has drawn criticism from Opposition party politicians.

 

Former Kerala finance minister Thomas Isaac for instance slammed the Centre over the agreement between the State Bank of India and Adani Capital for co-lending to farmers, saying it will benefit the private firm more by allowing it to piggyback a public sector behemoth with extensive reach and expertise.

 

As per the press release of SBI dated December 2, 2021,  the public sector has signed a master agreement with Adani Capital Private Ltd, the NBFC arm of Adani Group, for co-lending to farmers for purchase of tractors and farm implements, to increase efficiency in farm operations and productivity of crops.  SBI is actively looking at co-lending opportunities with multiple NBFCs for financing farm mechanisation, warehouse receipt finance, farmer producer organisations etc for enhancing credit flow to double the farmers income, stated the press release. 

 

The question, as Isaac has raised, is why SBI has to get into an agreement with such a small company when SBI already has 22,219 branches? SBI already has 1.37 crore farmers credit accounts and an outstanding farm credit of Rs 1,96,268 crore.  It has supply chain credit with 28,000 dealers, 14,000 vendors and various companies. SBI also has 71,968 business correspondents outlets as of March 21. 

 

 

Adani capital started its operations only in 2017.  It has a capital of just Rs 20 crores. It has only 63 branches with 738 employees in 6 states namely Maharashtra, Gujarat, Rajasthan, Karnataka, Uttar Pradesh and Tamil Nadu. It has just 28,000 customers with a loan outstanding of Rs. 1292 crores and a gross NPA of 1.38% already.  It has a loan limit of Rs.1476 crores from SBI, PNB, Indian, Canara, PSB, Union, Central Bank, BOI, SCB, DBS, ICICI, Axis, IDFC, Yes Bank, Karnataka Bank, Federal Bank, HDFC and NABKISSAN.

 

In no way Adani Capital is going to help SBI to increase farm credit. But it can use the name and infrastructure of SBI to approach farmers.

 

What is the alternative?

 

Definitely the reach of SBI to the farmers is not adequate. So SBI can easily convert all the 71,638 business correspondent outlets into micro small branches and triple the farm credit in a short term. 

 

 

RBI which has been opposed to corporates getting into banking has permitted the same corporates to get into Banking, hitch cocking Public Sector banks through Payment Banks and Non-Banking Financial companies. The NBFCs will be charging much higher interest rates and service charges. Can this be allowed by RBI?

 

Similarly a review of Jio Payment Bank is urgently needed. In 2017, SBI had somewhat a similar agreement in 2017 with Mukesh Ambani’s Reliance by joining as junior partner in Jio Payment Bank with 30% shareholding.  That time SBI claimed that this will pave way to reach larger number of customers who are Jio users. In 2018 SBI entered an agreement with Reliance Jio and stated that it will provide video banking facility and Jio will have partnership in the Yono, the digital transaction platform of SBI.  The reality is SBI has not achieved anything great out of this deal. 

 

The SBI annual report 2020-21 has an annexure which shows that Jio Payment Bank has not made any headway. After 4 years its deposits are just Rs 17.39 crores, borrowings Rs.9.74 crores and interest earned Rs.9.70 crore.

 

The employees and the trade unions have to oppose the Adani deal on its merits and refuse to lend to farmers through Adani Capital.  Instead they should give direct loans.  They already have tie ups with tractor dealers.  They should not be a party to the modern day money lender Adani using the banks’ money to have control over farmers.

 

 

Immediate investigations are needed at different levels. Who is influencing these decisions? How safe is SBI?

 

Though both SBI and Adani Capital can claim that their tie up is aimed at expanding rural and farm credit the RBI as a regulator must keep a watch on how big corporate group owned NBFCs leverage bank funds. True, many big corporate houses have promoted NBFCs and they access bank funds for on lending. But recent experience has shown that the boards of NBFCs run by big business houses have had to be taken over by the RBI because of non repayment of bank debt and other moral hazard issues. For instance, the board of one of the biggest NBFCs Reliance Capital has been superseded by RBI as it has failed to repay debt of banks and financial institutions and allegedly lent to own group firms. So, the relationship PSU banks establish with NBFCs run by big corporate groups need to be watched very carefully due to potential moral hazard problems.

 

These are risks which the regulator must keep in mind when  public sector banks establish special relationships with NBFCs run by big corporate groups.

 

Thomas Franco is Joint Convener, People First and Former President, All India State bank Officers Federation.



SBI కు అదానీ క్యాపిటల్ కు

రైతులకు రుణాలు మంజూరు చేయడానికి

Co - lending అగ్రిమెంట్ జరిగింది

 

SBI గురించి ఓ సారి తెలుసుకుందాం

 

22000 బ్రాంచ్ లు

60,000 ఏటీఎమ్ లు

48,00,000 కోట్ల రూపాయలు ఆస్తులు ....

1,40,00,000  రైతు ఖాతాలు..

రైతులకు ఇచ్చిన రుణాలు

2,00,000 కోట్ల రూపాయలు

 

అదానీ క్యాపిటల్ గురించి కూడా ఓసారి తెలుసుకుందా...

 

60 బ్రాంచ్ లు

13000 కోట్ల రూపాయలు ఆస్తులు

28000 రైతు ఖాతాలు

రైతులకు ఇచ్చిన రుణాలు

1300 కోట్ల రూపాయలు

 

ఈ co lending అగ్రిమెంట్

ఎలా అంటే...

 

రైతులకు ఇచ్చే రుణాలు లో 

80 శాతం SBI పెట్టుబడి పెడుతుంది...

20 శాతం అదానీ క్యాపిటల్ పెట్టుబడి పెడుతుంది...

 

పెట్టుబడి మాత్రమే SBI వారిది

రుణాలు ఇవ్వడం

రైతులు ఎంపిక అంతా

అదానీ క్యాపిటల్ చేస్తాదట...

 

డబ్బు SBI ఇస్తుంటే

రైతులకు అప్పు మాత్రం

అదానీ ఇస్తాడు....

లాభాలు మాత్రం

సగం సగం ...

 

ప్రపంచం మొత్తం మీద ఇటువంటి

అగ్రిమెంట్ ఎక్కడైనా జరగడం ఎవరైనా చూసారా...???

 

కొంతకాలానికి అదానీ క్యాపిటల్ బ్రాంచ్ లు విస్తరించాలి... ఎస్బిఐ బ్రాంచ్ లు తగ్గిపోవాలి......

కస్టమర్లు అందరూ అదానీ క్యాపిటల్ కు మారిపోవాలి... ఎస్బిఐ మూసేయాలి...

 

దేశాన్ని బ్యాంకింగ్ రంగాన్ని

వ్యవసాయ రంగాన్ని నాశనం చేస్తున్న

దుర్మార్గులు ఎవరో ఇప్పటికయినా అర్థం అయితే తరిమి కొట్టండి....

లేకపోతే మన తరువాత తరం వాళ్ళు  వడ్డీలు కట్టలేక


No comments:

Post a Comment